UWB vs Bluetooth® LE: Which One Is the More Accurate Solution?

,

When it comes to indoor positioning technologies, two contenders stand out: Bluetooth® Low Energy (LE) and UltraWideband (UWB). Let’s explore their key differences:

  1. Bluetooth® LE:
  • Purpose: Designed for low energy consumption, Bluetooth® LE serves as an energy-efficient alternative to classic Bluetooth®.
  • Beacons: Bluetooth® LE relies on beacons—small sensors strategically placed throughout a building. These beacons emit signals at specific intervals.
  • Range: Typically covers 10 to 30 meters (up to 100 meters in some cases).
  • Data Transfer Rate: Up to 2 Mbps.
  • Advantages: Affordable implementation, long beacon service life (around 5 years), easy installation, scalability, and real-time positioning capabilities.
  1. UWB (UltraWideband):
  • Range: UWB boasts an extended range, making it suitable for large facilities and comprehensive area monitoring. It can cover up to 200 meters (approximately 650 feet).
  • Frequency Range: UWB signals operate across frequencies from 3.12 to 10.6 GHz.
  • Accuracy: Known for its precision, UWB is ideal for scenarios where tracking an entire territory is essential.
  • Advantages: Scalability, accuracy, and suitability for large spaces.

In summary, choose Bluetooth® LE if you prioritize battery life and UWB if you need broader coverage and precision. Each technology has its niche, so consider your specific requirements and infrastructure when making a decision.

Learn more: UWB vs Bluetooth® LE - Which One To Choose For Indoor Positioning?